Sepultura - A-LEX

Eyesore wrote:

troublezone wrote:

Quote :

You can't "win" an argument by responding with things like this

So this is some kind of game or sport for you?

A game? You're making things up. It's called integrity. If you think it's okay to attribute nonsense to me and insist I said certain things then you're out of your mind.

Quote :

Quote :

I never said they should never play the old stuff

See quote below... you didn't say the word "never" but it's insinuated.
Why should the band play old stuff?

Good call. You just proved me right. I don't "insinuate" anything. I say it, flat out, in black and white. There is no middle ground with me. If people don't like it, too bad, but you can't just make things up and pull the "I know what you really meant" argument.

If I felt Sepultura should never play their old stuff, it would say EXACTLY that.

What integrity? To win a debate? Like i said...

Stating "why should they play the old stuff" speaks for itself.

Eyesore wrote:

troublezone wrote:

Quote :

especially considering how far removed the band is from that early material.

How far back is "early"? It's not that far removed from Chaos A.D.

Yes it is. Chaos A.D. came out FIFTEEN years ago.

Who cares how old it is?? I was speaking in terms of style. Chaos AD sounds nothing like Arise or Beneath either, so in that sense they were already a "different" band by then too. I don't see a huge differnce between Chaos and Against.

I don't have time to talk to a brick wall and play debate games when there are other topics for me to go look at. I don't even know why i've been wasting my time playing your game. If you want to think you "won" because i'm moving on then so be it.

One more thing... Have you ever thought of getting the word "nonsense" as a tattoo? You seem to apply it any time someone challenges your opinion. Later

troublezone wrote:

What integrity? To win a debate? Like i said...

Stating "why should they play the old stuff" speaks for itself.

Integrity is apparently something you lack.

troublezone wrote:

I don't have time to talk to a brick wall and play debate games when there are other topics for me to go look at. I don't even know why i've been wasting my time playing your game. If you want to think you "won" because i'm moving on then so be it.

This isn't about winning, nor is it a game. It's a damn discussion. Simple as that.

spectrefate wrote:

echo

mc666 wrote:

had to download this to hear for myself. i am loving this album. every song rips, with exception of the track Ludwig Van which sounds like a Savatage/TSO rip off & is totally out of place on the record. other than that, i think the album is actually better than Dante! can't wait for the release.

Diff'rent strokes for diff'rent folks I guess... after five or six listens it still does nothin' for me...

Eyesore wrote:

troublezone wrote:

What integrity? To win a debate? Like i said...

Stating "why should they play the old stuff" speaks for itself.

Integrity is apparently something you lack.

Did i get under you skin? Go listen to Def Leppard and chill out.

Eyesore wrote:

troublezone wrote:

I don't have time to talk to a brick wall and play debate games when there are other topics for me to go look at. I don't even know why i've been wasting my time playing your game. If you want to think you "won" because i'm moving on then so be it.

This isn't about winning, nor is it a game. It's a damn discussion. Simple as that.

You stated your opinion. Move on!

Alright, that's about enough. I'm locking this one up as you guys are no longer anywhere close to the realm of "debating".

Who is Derrick Green? Don't bother answering, I don't care. Gonna go put on some Zombie Apocalypse now.