Let us be fair for the sake of being fair!

The White House dictating Big Tech policy regarding monitoring of alleged "misinformation" (allegory for political opposition) by government agencies, kinda/sorta erodes the "private entity" defense for social media platforms. It undermines so many of our civil liberties.

Remember the EXACT day FaceBook was instituted. The Pentagon ended their "information harvesting" Lifelog Project. The correlation is definitely a  

James B. wrote:

The White House dictating Big Tech policy regarding monitoring of alleged "misinformation" (allegory for political opposition) by government agencies, kinda/sorta erodes the "private entity" defense for social media platforms. It undermines so many of our civil liberties.

Remember the EXACT day FaceBook was instituted. The Pentagon ended their "information harvesting" Lifelog Project. The correlation is definitely a  

to an extent the Biden Administration only said what everyone knew to be true. Social Media is a classic case of minority influence - I believe only 3% of the US has a Twitter account but folks treat it as gospel.

This is the gift that keeps on giving to Republicans...

Tik Tok openly spies on American Citizens, and the lapdog Biden does nothing… 10% for the “big guy”.

China is having their way. They modified Covid in their Wuhan lab and killed millions worldwide (biological warfare). Meanwhile, bend-over Biden does nothing… acknowledges nothing… and mumbles and stumbles like the biggest buffoon of all time. He makes Ozzy look like a rocket scientist.

Need advics...

Thinking of art as an investment, should I purchase a Hunter Biden painting for $400,000 or a Picasso for $125,000 ?



Can anyone say "money laundering" ? Also, Hunter got about a million bucks for writing a book that nobody bought. .. Then gets offer for another one.

The trillions printed since WuFlu hit in government relief legislation has to go somewhere right

James B. wrote:

Need advics...

Thinking of art as an investment,  should I purchase a Hunter Biden painting for $400,000 or a Picasso for $125,000 ?



Can anyone say "money laundering" ? Also, Hunter got about a million bucks for writing a book that nobody bought. .. Then gets offer for another one.  

The trillions printed since WuFlu hit in government relief legislation has to go somewhere right  

The Hunter Biden debacle is a microcosm of the corruption that is endemic to Washington D.C.  Joe Biden and his grifter family has been a known "secret" for decades.  Same with Nancy Pelosi (man, she's made out like a bandit recently with "her husband's" purchase of Tesla, and then Amazon stock, just before government announcements of partnerships with....  Tesla and Amazon).  Cocaine Mitch?  His CCP-tied father-in-law MIGHT sway how he does business...  Go find out why they ACTUALLY call him cocaine Mitch...  Graham, Schumer, etc  ALL OF THEM have been playing the public for FOOLS.

Left-wing, right-wing, SAME FUCKING VULTURE

SideShowDisaSter wrote:

James B. wrote:

Need advics...

Thinking of art as an investment,  should I purchase a Hunter Biden painting for $400,000 or a Picasso for $125,000 ?



Can anyone say "money laundering" ? Also, Hunter got about a million bucks for writing a book that nobody bought. .. Then gets offer for another one.  

The trillions printed since WuFlu hit in government relief legislation has to go somewhere right  

The Hunter Biden debacle is a microcosm of the corruption that is endemic to Washington D.C.  Joe Biden and his grifter family has been a known "secret" for decades.  Same with Nancy Pelosi (man, she's made out like a bandit recently with "her husband's" purchase of Tesla, and then Amazon stock, just before government announcements of partnerships with....  Tesla and Amazon).  Cocaine Mitch?  His CCP-tied father-in-law MIGHT sway how he does business...  Go find out why they ACTUALLY call him cocaine Mitch...  Graham, Schumer, etc  ALL OF THEM have been playing the public for FOOLS.

Left-wing, right-wing, SAME FUCKING VULTURE

+1

I could never get the math to work as to how politicians take office with minimal savings and leave millionaires? Even more so for Mitch since he and his wife both worked for the government...

SideShowDisaSter wrote:

Left-wing, right-wing, SAME FUCKING VULTURE

(IMHDO)
Since Kennedy 's assassination (He was the first to fight the establishment) Democrat/Republican have pretty much been two sides of the same coin.

Johnson was the one who established the welfare state, signed first legislation to remove the  required 25% "gold cover" of federal reserve notes in 1968, initiated policy for regime change in Vietnam, and really pushed nationally for division within the Overton window. From there you see the repeating of a Hegelian Dialectic from Nixon through the current guy to distract and/or divide.

From my front porch & my back deck, it sure looks like as technology advances...The general population goes in the other direction. Most are either artificially pacified or totally pussified. Much worse, think elected officials have their best interests at heart or can be subdued with a stimulus check

James B. wrote:

SideShowDisaSter wrote:

Left-wing, right-wing, SAME FUCKING VULTURE

(IMHDO)
Since Kennedy 's assassination (He was the first to fight the establishment) Democrat/Republican have pretty much been two sides of the same coin.

Johnson was the one who established the welfare state, signed first legislation to remove the  required 25% "gold cover" of federal reserve notes in 1968, initiated policy for regime change in Vietnam, and really pushed nationally for division within the Overton window. From there you see the repeating of a Hegelian Dialectic from Nixon through the current guy to distract and/or divide.

From my front porch & my back deck, it sure looks like as technology advances...The general population goes in the other direction. Most are either artificially pacified or totally pussified. Much worse, think elected officials have their best interests at heart or can be subdued with a stimulus check

Johnson is primarily responsible for the conditions many are in today. His requirement that welfare checks are only available for unmarried women with children is the reason 70% of African American moms being single moms and 40% of White women being single moms. Kids need a father and mother in the home.

That policy has not changed much under either party since and the state of our families is in serious decay.

In other news: in the continuing trend to pretend a man wanting to be a woman is normal, SI is putting a surgically morphed man on the cover of the Swimsuit Issue. I've not received this issue for over a decade now, but now I've officially cut all ties with SI which now is a boring woke propaganda pamphlet.

scottmitchell74 wrote:

In other news: in the continuing trend to pretend a man wanting to be a woman is normal, SI is putting a surgically morphed man on the cover of the Swimsuit Issue. I've not received this issue for over a decade now, but now I've officially cut all ties with SI which now is a boring woke propaganda pamphlet.

It doesn’t make any sense. There is more than enough real women in the world, this isn’t prison. Women outnumber men 2 to 1 all over the world. The NWO is all about artificial.

Artificial intelligence, artificial genders… man made crap!

exact33 wrote:

James B. wrote:

SideShowDisaSter wrote:

Left-wing, right-wing, SAME FUCKING VULTURE

(IMHDO)
Since Kennedy 's assassination (He was the first to fight the establishment) Democrat/Republican have pretty much been two sides of the same coin.

Johnson was the one who established the welfare state, signed first legislation to remove the  required 25% "gold cover" of federal reserve notes in 1968, initiated policy for regime change in Vietnam, and really pushed nationally for division within the Overton window. From there you see the repeating of a Hegelian Dialectic from Nixon through the current guy to distract and/or divide.

From my front porch & my back deck, it sure looks like as technology advances...The general population goes in the other direction. Most are either artificially pacified or totally pussified. Much worse, think elected officials have their best interests at heart or can be subdued with a stimulus check

Johnson is primarily responsible for the conditions many are in today. His requirement that welfare checks are only available for unmarried women with children is the reason 70% of African American moms being single moms and 40% of White women being single moms. Kids need a father and mother in the home.

That policy has not changed much under either party since and the state of our families is in serious decay.

Thomas Sowell argues, quite unassailably, that Johnson and his "Great Society" is one of the root causes of the decay in black America. Until that act, black families had some of the highest upward social and economic mobility in the country.

SideShowDisaSter wrote:

exact33 wrote:

James B. wrote:

SideShowDisaSter wrote:

Left-wing, right-wing, SAME FUCKING VULTURE

(IMHDO)
Since Kennedy 's assassination (He was the first to fight the establishment) Democrat/Republican have pretty much been two sides of the same coin.

Johnson was the one who established the welfare state, signed first legislation to remove the  required 25% "gold cover" of federal reserve notes in 1968, initiated policy for regime change in Vietnam, and really pushed nationally for division within the Overton window. From there you see the repeating of a Hegelian Dialectic from Nixon through the current guy to distract and/or divide.

From my front porch & my back deck, it sure looks like as technology advances...The general population goes in the other direction. Most are either artificially pacified or totally pussified. Much worse, think elected officials have their best interests at heart or can be subdued with a stimulus check

Johnson is primarily responsible for the conditions many are in today. His requirement that welfare checks are only available for unmarried women with children is the reason 70% of African American moms being single moms and 40% of White women being single moms. Kids need a father and mother in the home.

That policy has not changed much under either party since and the state of our families is in serious decay.

Thomas Sowell argues, quite unassailably, that Johnson and his "Great Society" is one of the root causes of the decay in black America.  Until that act, black families had some of the highest upward social and economic mobility in the country.

That man is an absolute genius and the Left has been ignoring his amazing work for over 40 years. His incredible research doesn't fit the life-long victim mentality.

https://www.jodymichael.com/blog/victim-mentality-stands-in-the-way-of-accountability/

I'm not a huge fan of sports host Colin Cowherd but he often says that if your life is still messed up past 35-40 that's on you. That's plenty of time to have make your mistakes, see how things work and get busy getting your life together

Thomas Sowell is brilliant (IMHDO)

In other news....

Somewhere in the USA at this very mkment, there is a 2 year old child. The mother is a stripper, the father is a crackhead, and the grandpa is the president.

James B. wrote:

Thomas Sowell is brilliant (IMHDO)

In other news....

Somewhere in the USA at this very mkment, there is a 2 year old child. The mother is a stripper, the father is a crackhead, and the grandpa is the president.

I agree. Sowell is brilliant. I really enjoy his analysis.

in other news - Andrew Cuomo's response to the NY AG report on his sexual harassment investigation is Bill Cosby cringeworthy....

That's a sleazy dude.

So... anybody else have a problem with giving a government bureaucracy with no accountability emergency powers that never existed before to undermine property rights?

James B. wrote:

So... anybody else have a problem with giving a government bureaucracy with no accountability emergency powers that never existed before to undermine property rights?

I think moratorium on rent is downright criminal at this point. What many forget is that in addition to the loss or rent, landlords are still required to upkeep the property so if the AC dies or other maintenance they have to pay even though the renter is not paying. There are programs out there to help landlords but many require the renter to participate - which is not occurring very often.

The media is portraying landlords as father moneybags when in fact over half of landlords are middleclass people who invested for their retirement and carry a mortgage, insurance, etc. I would normally say these landlords took a calculated risk but this type of government interference is basically a handout to corporations that will come in and buy these properties after the current owner cannot keep incurring the bills...

The sad thing is that landlords will remember these events and raise their rent to future proof themselves...

The Federal Reserve has already printed and gifted banks with trillions of $ since WuFlu hit and common sense would usually dictate they'd absorb the hit temporarily way better than those having to cover a note in the (manipulated) current state of the economy in the long run.

California already has passed legislation that the state has first dibs in purchasing foreclosed commercial & residential property (for pennies on the dollar) prior to it going to either auction of back on the market.


They are stealing land and cash, hand over fist, while the populace argues over a vaccine that isn't t even a vaccine and don't see/don't care they willingly let the government slowly strip away civil liberties & Constitutional Rights cause of fear based on decade after decade of lies

.

exact33 wrote:

James B. wrote:

So... anybody else have a problem with giving a government bureaucracy with no accountability emergency powers that never existed before to undermine property rights?

I think moratorium on rent is downright criminal at this point. What many forget is that in addition to the loss or rent, landlords are still required to upkeep the property so if the AC dies or other maintenance they have to pay even though the renter is not paying. There are programs out there to help landlords but many require the renter to participate - which is not occurring very often.

The media is portraying landlords as father moneybags when in fact over half of landlords are middleclass people who invested for their retirement and carry a mortgage, insurance, etc. I would normally say these landlords took a calculated risk but this type of government interference is basically a handout to corporations that will come in and buy these properties after the current owner cannot keep incurring the bills...

The sad thing is that landlords will remember these events and raise their rent to future proof themselves...

I completely agree exact.  Instead of "Give me liberty or give me death" we've become a society of "Give me free shit and I don't care who actually has to pay for it"

tohostudios wrote:

 Instead of "Give me liberty or give me death" we've become a society of "Give me free shit and I don't care who actually has to pay for it"

I tip my hard hat to you kind sir!

Similar to watching clips of people screaming "F Capialism" while wearing $200 skinny jeans, $400 Nikes, and filming themselves on a $1200 Iphone.

James B. wrote:

tohostudios wrote:

 Instead of "Give me liberty or give me death" we've become a society of "Give me free shit and I don't care who actually has to pay for it"

I tip my hard hat to you kind sir!

Similar to watching clips of people screaming "F Capialism" while wearing $200 skinny jeans, $400 Nikes, and filming themselves on a $1200 Iphone.

while sipping $6 custom made drinks... the sad reality is if the country turns to socialism these folks will get a good dose of reality. I doubt Bernie and AOC will care a minute for the common folk...

I only agree with the Republicans on two issues only. Gun Control and Illegal immigration. Nothing else.

If you ban guns only bad people will have them.

If a person does not want to become a legal citizen get the hell out or go through the system correctly.

Jan It Or wrote:

I only agree with the Republicans on two issues only. Gun Control and Illegal immigration. Nothing else.

If you ban guns only bad people will have them.

If a person does not want to become a legal citizen get the hell out or go through the system correctly.

Well if you’re gonna agree on something, those are two major issues to agree with!

Just seen that the Secretary of State for California says voters can print their own ballot and mail it in to that at office in the upcoming recall election.

No problem with that