Accept vs. Riot

Took me a week to think about it, but Accept. Hell, they were a staple of my childhood and pushed me into new musical territory. Riot is a more recent find, probably ten years ago or so. Riot is more consistent, however.

I like the original version of Riot (Rock City through Born In America) better than Accept.  So I chose Riot.

Not really sure why there are being compared though, very different sounds.

I'm a big fan of both bands so it's a very tough call, but I voted for Riot. I like most of their albums and the different line-ups to varying degrees.

S.D. wrote:

I like the original version of Riot (Rock City through Born In America) better than Accept.  So I chose Riot.

Not really sure why there are being compared though, very different sounds.

same here. Riot was perfect from the debut to Born In America. Don't care anymore for their albums after those.
Accept is cool, but the 2 or 3 albums I like a lot by them don't move me as much as Riot's.

I voted Riot just because I have such fond college memories of the "Fire Down Under" album and because I didn't really like much Accept with Udo on vocals; I like the current Accept singer much better, he's not quite as "nasally".

Accept