Subject: Re: Machine Head Wed Apr 14, 2010 6:48 am
^^ Unfortunately I can't see this happening. Rob Flynn even refused to join Vio-lence on the Thrash of the Titans benefit concert for Chuck & Chuck in 2001... which was so disrespectful given the circumstances I lost all my respect for this guy and never cared for Machine Head afterward. It was probably for my own good, as I've seen a clip on the telly once and it was some horrible rap-crap-nu-metal thing I couldn't care less for.
Mglaffas81 Heart of Metal
Number of posts : 2256 Age : 40
Subject: Re: Machine Head Wed Apr 14, 2010 7:03 am
My opinion is about the same as ult's and a few others - Burn My Eyes and The Blackening are their best albums. The debut is alright, but nowhere near a favourite. The Blackening is much better. "Clenching The Fists Of Dissent" is a MONSTER song. However, I do think that Flynn's vocals can get tiresome. Machine Head ain't really the band I listen to the most, but there are 4-5 songs I really like, that get the most listens.
MetalGuy71 Bukkake Tsunami
Number of posts : 25557 Age : 53
Subject: Re: Machine Head Wed Apr 14, 2010 11:29 am
The only one I own is Burn My Eyes. Never felt compelled to go any further, based mostly on reviews and opinions I've read here at the Heart of Metal. I've thought about picking up The Blackeneing after seeing them open for Metallica, but it's not a priority at the moment.
_________________ I used to be with it, but then they changed what "it" was. Now what I'm with isn't it, and what's it seems weird and scary to me, and it'll happen to you, too.
MetalRob331 Dinky Do
Number of posts : 4830 Age : 43
Subject: Re: Machine Head Wed Apr 14, 2010 11:43 am
So powerful and man what an ending,,,,
One of my favorite songs from these guys... At one time Machine Head were a favorite band of mine. Burn My Eyes and The More Things Change are always in my cd player...
ultmetal Administrator
Number of posts : 19452 Age : 57
Subject: Re: Machine Head Mon Oct 10, 2011 6:05 pm
Attempting to review "Through The Ashes Of Empires" now. I have read some reviews on Amazon and most say it's a "return to form", many comparing it to the band's debut. Even the description on Amazon states, "Not only is Through The Ashes Of Empires huge sonically, but the music possesses a fierceness and power that rivals those seminal early albums."
What I hear is a bit confusing, like the band are trying to be all things to all people. It's a mixture of metalcore, still some nu-metal, some neo-thrash metal, and all that is angry and piss-off at the world. The only real difference between "Through the Ashes" and the the last three studio albums that preceded it is that there is more speed, a few choice leads and less rap vocals. Otherwise it just seems to be more of the same and I really don't care for most of the vocals.
_________________ ULTIMATUM - TOO METAL FOR WIKIPEDIA!
Eyesore Metal is my Life
Number of posts : 12815 Age : 49
Subject: Re: Machine Head Mon Oct 10, 2011 7:35 pm
ultmetal wrote:
Attempting to review "Through The Ashes Of Empires" now. I have read some reviews on Amazon and most say it's a "return to form", many comparing it to the band's debut. Even the description on Amazon states, "Not only is Through The Ashes Of Empires huge sonically, but the music possesses a fierceness and power that rivals those seminal early albums."
What I hear is a bit confusing, like the band are trying to be all things to all people. It's a mixture of metalcore, still some nu-metal, some neo-thrash metal, and all that is angry and piss-off at the world. The only real difference between "Through the Ashes" and the the last three studio albums that preceded it is that there is more speed, a few choice leads and less rap vocals. Otherwise it just seems to be more of the same and I really don't care for most of the vocals.
Sigh...
They have TWO SONGS—"Desire to Fire" and "From This Day"—that even remotely resemble rap vocals. Why do so many people insist otherwise? And even then, anyone who is a fan of rapcore/rap-metal knows that those two songs are anything but that. The Burning Red does have some nu-metal-like riffs, less so on Supercharger, though that album is very weak overall. There is NO metalcore. None whatsoever on any Machine Head album.
ultmetal Administrator
Number of posts : 19452 Age : 57
Subject: Re: Machine Head Mon Oct 10, 2011 8:27 pm
Eyesore wrote:
ultmetal wrote:
Attempting to review "Through The Ashes Of Empires" now. I have read some reviews on Amazon and most say it's a "return to form", many comparing it to the band's debut. Even the description on Amazon states, "Not only is Through The Ashes Of Empires huge sonically, but the music possesses a fierceness and power that rivals those seminal early albums."
What I hear is a bit confusing, like the band are trying to be all things to all people. It's a mixture of metalcore, still some nu-metal, some neo-thrash metal, and all that is angry and piss-off at the world. The only real difference between "Through the Ashes" and the the last three studio albums that preceded it is that there is more speed, a few choice leads and less rap vocals. Otherwise it just seems to be more of the same and I really don't care for most of the vocals.
Sigh...
They have TWO SONGS—"Desire to Fire" and "From This Day"—that even remotely resemble rap vocals. Why do so many people insist otherwise? And even then, anyone who is a fan of rapcore/rap-metal knows that those two songs are anything but that. The Burning Red does have some nu-metal-like riffs, less so on Supercharger, though that album is very weak overall. There is NO metalcore. None whatsoever on any Machine Head album.
No metalcore? Really? You could put some of those riffs on recent Living Sacrifice albums and you wouldn't know the difference.
As far as rap vocals, even this album has some vocals that are rapped. "Left Unfinished" is a heavy, groove-laden, modern metal song. The verses on this song is half rapped and half shouted, and the stop/start riffing are definitely of the nu-metal variety. I'm not saying that it's bad, it just is what it is.
_________________ ULTIMATUM - TOO METAL FOR WIKIPEDIA!
Alex Dee Rokket Heart of Metal
Number of posts : 1095 Age : 41
Subject: Re: Machine Head Mon Oct 10, 2011 8:51 pm
I think to begin with Machine Head were one of the flagship post-thrash 90s metal bands. Along side bands like Pantera and Fear Factory, MH were viewed as a the sound of the mid 90s American metal. Burn My Eyes is all groove pissed off attack, not too dissimilar to Pantera's sound at the time albeit lacking that really tight in your face delivery.
Nevertheless, Burn My Eyes was a very strong debut album for the band and at the time it was seen as a release that proved metal was alive, fresh and different.
For the band however Burn My Eyes would prove a very hard album to top. Turmoil within the band and lack of a strong sense of identity had the band lost in the wilderness for years. The More Things change, their sophomore album, although similar to BMI was a tad slower, and lacked the same confidence with which the banf started out. The songs were good but also sounding like the band was trying too hard to top BMI. I read at the time TMC came out that the band had re-written the album twice before releasing the final product.
As for the years between TMC and The Blackening. In the late 90s the heavy maintream music landscape was dominated by what later became known as nu-metal. Bands like \"thebandthatshallneverbementionedagain\", Limp Bizkit, Slipkmot, Coal Chamber, Deftones, Soulfly and many more were all over airwaves sth the time. Machine Head in part due to label pressure and partly because of line up changes would go down the numetal path for the next several years.
The Burning Red was MH's first attempt at nu-metal. The album was produced by Ross Robinson who at the time was the producer of choice for nu-metal bands and was generally acclaimed for giving bands the type of bad ass identity that kids associated with back in the late 90s. Despite some fan alienation, The Burning Red was generally well received by at the time MH's large young newfound fanbase. So much so that MH even changed the style of their older songs for their live shows. That's right, audiences were now being treated to rap-metal versions of older songs at live shows. The band looked very goofy on stage and behaved like some second rate ICP. That's what was in at the time and MH, despite all the current back-paddling, were loving every minute.
What changed - well the band had one more shot at riding the wave of nu-metal's popularity with Supercharger, released some 2 year later after TBR. The album tanked badly one becuase nu-metal's popularity waned down significantly after 2000 with many acts being dropped off and most of the scene being overshadowed by Slipknot's popularity as well as the rise of European metal, and for MH also some very bad publicity after backstage fighting and public slurring with Slayer.
Supercharger was easily one of the decade's worst metal related albums ranking up there with St Anger. It led to the demise of the band with the band being booted off their long time label Roadrunner.
Through The Ashes saw the band rise again. Seversl years had passed after Supercharger. The band regrouped with Phil Demmel on guitar and a fresh new sounding akin to their first two albums albeit more modern, borrowing elements from the european metal scene but largely also sounding quite unique. From then on, Machine Head's less than attractive past was forgiven. Their comeback album was not only a return to form but the band's redemption. They have been on a high ever since.
Eyesore Metal is my Life
Number of posts : 12815 Age : 49
Subject: Re: Machine Head Mon Oct 10, 2011 9:09 pm
ultmetal wrote:
Eyesore wrote:
ultmetal wrote:
Attempting to review "Through The Ashes Of Empires" now. I have read some reviews on Amazon and most say it's a "return to form", many comparing it to the band's debut. Even the description on Amazon states, "Not only is Through The Ashes Of Empires huge sonically, but the music possesses a fierceness and power that rivals those seminal early albums."
What I hear is a bit confusing, like the band are trying to be all things to all people. It's a mixture of metalcore, still some nu-metal, some neo-thrash metal, and all that is angry and piss-off at the world. The only real difference between "Through the Ashes" and the the last three studio albums that preceded it is that there is more speed, a few choice leads and less rap vocals. Otherwise it just seems to be more of the same and I really don't care for most of the vocals.
Sigh...
They have TWO SONGS—"Desire to Fire" and "From This Day"—that even remotely resemble rap vocals. Why do so many people insist otherwise? And even then, anyone who is a fan of rapcore/rap-metal knows that those two songs are anything but that. The Burning Red does have some nu-metal-like riffs, less so on Supercharger, though that album is very weak overall. There is NO metalcore. None whatsoever on any Machine Head album.
No metalcore? Really? You could put some of those riffs on recent Living Sacrifice albums and you wouldn't know the difference.
As far as rap vocals, even this album has some vocals that are rapped. "Left Unfinished" is a heavy, groove-laden, modern metal song. The verses on this song is half rapped and half shouted, and the stop/start riffing are definitely of the nu-metal variety. I'm not saying that it's bad, it just is what it is.
Aside from their admitted attempt at mainstream success (i.e. The Burning Red and Supercharger), Machine Head have always been a heavy, groove-laden modern metal band. At one time they were called "post-thrash," which of course changed when it became cool to dislike them.
"Left Unfinished" is not rapped at all. Anyone thinking that, doesn't like or know rap. It's a huge stretch to label that rap in any regard. I mean, is Tom Araya rapping in "Hell Awaits?" He sure as hell ain't singing! That's probably not the best example, but still...rap is a very distinct style. Short bursts or vocals do not necessarily indicate "rapped" vocals.
And no, stop/start riffing is not indicative of nu-metal. First off, nu-metal is a stupid term because it can't possibly represent a style of music. Just look at the absurd amount of bands labeled nu-metal that sound nothing like each other. If Korn is nu-metal and Deftones is nu-metal and Disturbed is nu-metal, three bands that sound nothing alike, how is Machine Head nu-metal?
I also hear no metalcore, unless you're viewing metalcore as "heavy, groove-laden, modern metal." To me, metalcore is a distinct mix of heavy metal and hardcore, leaning heavily on the hardcore side of things (ex. Pro-Pain). It seems that the mainstream looks at metalcore as modern extreme metal with screaming and half-hearted clean-vocal choruses. Others see it as mainstream melodic death metal. Whatever the case, I hear none of it in Machine Head.
Alex Dee Rokket Heart of Metal
Number of posts : 1095 Age : 41
Subject: Re: Machine Head Mon Oct 10, 2011 9:25 pm
as far as the nu-metal style is concerned, the tag became used too liberally for anything that came out in the late 90s on roadrunner records, for anything that had a modern image of metal as opposed to the traditional 80s heavy metal image, for any band that had modern production and songs that were neither power metal, death or black metal and so on... it was pejoratively as a rejection for anything that did not idolize and pay tribute to metal bands from an era gone by.
the term was also widely used for any bands that mixed distorted guitars and rap vocals - Limp Bizkit was a prime example, however nu-metal was seldom used to actually encompass rap-metal bands, the reasoning is reflected in my paragraph above. People, metalheads, despised numetal because it was something trendy. Similar to how in the 80s thrashers disliked glam metal, seeing it a "false" metal.
Eyesore Metal is my Life
Number of posts : 12815 Age : 49
Subject: Re: Machine Head Mon Oct 10, 2011 9:28 pm
Totally agree and have said as much here before.
ultmetal Administrator
Number of posts : 19452 Age : 57
Subject: Re: Machine Head Mon Oct 10, 2011 11:46 pm
Rough draft of "Through The Ashes Of Empires" review:
Quote :
Machine Head has always been the brainchild of guitarist Robb Flynn. Each new album has seen Machine Head going for new sounds, staying fairly heavy, but wavering between modern trends in heavy music. "Through the Ashes of Empires" was billed as a return to form, sounding closer to the band's debut than they ever have.
Opening track "Imperium" is simply a wall of sound that is brutally bludgeoning. The heavy, down-tuned guitar sound and the crushing riffs are a musical assault to the ears. This is THE standout cut on the album. "Bite the Bullet" ebbs and flows between aggressive, down-tuned modern metal with angry shouted vocals and modern/alternative rock with clean guitars and shaky clean vocals. The song starts off crushing and heavy and loses momentum a bit when the verses begin. "Left Unfinished" is another ultra-heavy, groove-laden, modern metal song. The song begins with an eerie intro which leads into another wall of sound. The verses on this song, which are sort of half rapped and half shouted, and the stop/start riffing are definitely of the nu-metal variety. "Elegy" is a doomy, droning song with the verses sung and the choruses shouted in typical core fashion.
Unfortunately there isn't a whole lot of lead work on this album. "Vim" is heavy song with a heavy mid-paced groove and offers some nice lead work from new guitarist Phil Demmel, who had formerly been in Violence with Flynn and who replaces Ahrue Luster. "In The Presence of My Enemies" is one of the other songs that features some nice lead work. This song reminds me a bit of Pantera, but at seven minutes long tends to drone on a little too long. The North American bonus track, "Seasons Wither" is another standout cut. The song is an upbeat thrasher and really does echo back to the band's roots. The album closes with one of the stronger songs on the album. "Descend The Shades of Night" begins as a somber, acoustic ballad and builds to a heavy, doomy modern metal song and then ends as it began. This song is nearly eight minutes long but doesn't get boring, like the aforementioned "In The Presence of My Enemies".
For the most part, Flynn's vocals are the weakest part of this CD. Much of the time he is just yelling like some pissed off drunk guy arguing with another pissed off drunk guy. I frankly don't understand the appeal of these "angry" type of vocals. I think there is a vast difference between the aggression of harsh thrash metal vocals and death metal growls, and these angry yells. They are, for the most part, boring. Once again, the lyrics tend to focus on testosterone fueled aggression, anger and even depression, frustration and despair. Everyone is ticked off at everyone else and can't stand their miserable lives. "Left Unfinished", for example, has Flynn spewing venom, "F**k you, you c**k-sucker, f**k you, you smurf-for-hire...". Perhaps I am just from the wrong generation. I remember when metal was about enjoying life and having a good time.
"Through The Ashes Of Empires" is not a bad album, and has several songs I really enjoy, such as the opening and closing tracks. Unlike "Supercharger" I didn't find myself wanting to hit the skip button on every song. However, it's not exactly the return to form that some people claim that it is either. "Through the Ashes" really seems to be a combination of all the past Machine Head albums with a bit more speed, a few choices guitar leads and no attempts at rapcore. Though it may not be Burn My Eyes Part 2, it's definitely a step in that direction.
And yes, I do know what rap is.
_________________ ULTIMATUM - TOO METAL FOR WIKIPEDIA!
Last edited by ultmetal on Tue Oct 11, 2011 4:47 pm; edited 1 time in total
Eyesore Metal is my Life
Number of posts : 12815 Age : 49
Subject: Re: Machine Head Tue Oct 11, 2011 12:35 am
Maybe so, but it's not on this album.
Alex Dee Rokket Heart of Metal
Number of posts : 1095 Age : 41
Subject: Re: Machine Head Tue Oct 11, 2011 12:55 am
Well neither Burning Red or Supercharge have exclusively rap vocals, there are however some rap-style vocals scattered all over both albums. These albums however deserve more criticism for the fact that Machine Head was trying to copy other bands at the time in an attempt to stay relevant and "trendy". The Burning Red has vastly better songs than Supercharger, which is largely an uninspiring and unmemorable experience.
Neither Ashes nor The Blackening have any rapping nor are they metalcore albums. The vocal style on both albums is similar to the earlier Machine Head albums. The more melodic vocals however are similar to style Robb Flynn used on The Burning Red, however I don't see this as a negative aspect. If anything the band is pulling together all the best elements from their earlier albums whilst advancing Machine Head's sound to a new level, which is essentially what the band has achieved consistently over the last 3 albums (including Unto The Locust).
I feel this thread may be a case of some peole liking the band and others trying to find whst the big deal about them is. I say there is nothing more counter-productive than trying to understand a band or trying to like them. If you like some aspects about their sound but you have yet to fully appreciate their music, it is probably best to listen to something else and return to them at a later stage. I often find that my tastes adapt to new style and new bands better when I revisit them at another stage.
ultmetal Administrator
Number of posts : 19452 Age : 57
Subject: Re: Machine Head Tue Oct 11, 2011 10:19 am
Seems a pretty accurate description of this song to me, "After an eerie thirty second intro, the follow-up song "Left Unfinished" is another heavy, groove-laden, modern metal song. The verses on this song, which are sort of half rapped and half shouted, and the stop/start riffing are definitely of the nu-metal variety."
Check out from about 1:00 to 1:20, or 2:09 - 2:22 in the song. You don't hear the "half rapped and half shouted" vocals?
I actually like some nu-metal, so I don't say that as some sort of put down. I consider bands like Sevendust and Disturbed to be nu-metal and I like them both a lot. I also like this song, but there is no doubt that some of those verses are "rap-style vocals", as Alex Dee Rockket described. I'm not saying it's 2Pac or Public Enemy.
_________________ ULTIMATUM - TOO METAL FOR WIKIPEDIA!
Mglaffas81 Heart of Metal
Number of posts : 2256 Age : 40
Subject: Re: Machine Head Tue Oct 11, 2011 10:39 am
ultmetal wrote:
Seems a pretty accurate description of this song to me, "After an eerie thirty second intro, the follow-up song "Left Unfinished" is another heavy, groove-laden, modern metal song. The verses on this song, which are sort of half rapped and half shouted, and the stop/start riffing are definitely of the nu-metal variety."
Check out from about 1:00 to 1:20, or 2:09 - 2:22 in the song. You don't hear the "half rapped and half shouted" vocals?
I actually like some nu-metal, so I don't say that as some sort of put down. I consider bands like Sevendust and Disturbed to be nu-metal and I like them both a lot. I also like this song, but there is no doubt that some of those verses are "rap-style vocals", as Alex Dee Rockket described. I'm not saying it's 2Pac or Public Enemy.
I will not try to label that song anything, other than say that it is complete sh!t.
I don't really consider Disturbed "Nu-Metal", though - Maybe more so in their early days, but their later outputs have completely moved away from any of that - Just check the awesome "Indestructible" - there's no nu-metal AT ALL in that song. Disturbed have vertainly improved in the last few years, "Indestructible" being their best album, in my opinion.
ultmetal Administrator
Number of posts : 19452 Age : 57
Subject: Re: Machine Head Tue Oct 11, 2011 10:47 am
Quote :
Machine Head - Through The Ashes Of Empires 7/10 Though crushing and pummeling and relentlessly rhythmic, Machine Head still kind of blow a lot of their momentum in this thing by washing out come verse time, or meandering into (or out of) doom at any other given moment. It's like they've put up a smokescreen at their naughty nu-metal mid-years, but the spikey hair and piercing cans still be glimpsed through watered eyes. What you get is a concerted return to glory (main Machinist Rob Flynn produced with Colin Richardson mixing), huge stony guitars everywhere, with sleight of hand references to nu and metalcore. Not sure what is stopping me from full applause. Maybe it's those roar/sing vocals, or the quite complicated structures track after track. But, still, man, this is heavy and bleak and deserves to be accepted by a majority of those who pin for Burn My Eyes Part II, yet understand it can never feel the same again. -Martin Popoff
_________________ ULTIMATUM - TOO METAL FOR WIKIPEDIA!
Fat Freddy Metal, Movies, Beer
Number of posts : 37971 Age : 54
Subject: Re: Machine Head Tue Oct 11, 2011 11:43 am
I saw M.H. open for Metallica two years ago. They weren't bad onstage (and they were nice enough to perform the one song of theirs I do like, "Imperium") but on record they do nothin' for me.
_________________ "If you're a false, don't entry, because you'll be burned and died!"
ultmetal Administrator
Number of posts : 19452 Age : 57
Subject: Re: Machine Head Tue Oct 11, 2011 2:09 pm
I saw MH open for Megadeth on the Cryptic Writings tour. They were very good on that tour.
_________________ ULTIMATUM - TOO METAL FOR WIKIPEDIA!
MetalGuy71 Bukkake Tsunami
Number of posts : 25557 Age : 53
Subject: Re: Machine Head Tue Oct 11, 2011 2:23 pm
Fat Freddy wrote:
I saw M.H. open for Metallica two years ago. They weren't bad onstage (and they were nice enough to perform the one song of theirs I do like, "Imperium") but on record they do nothin' for me.
I saw them on that tour as well. Decent enough, but nothing that made me seek out anymore of their albums. I'll stick with the lone album I have, Burn My Eyes.
_________________ I used to be with it, but then they changed what "it" was. Now what I'm with isn't it, and what's it seems weird and scary to me, and it'll happen to you, too.
dark avenger Metal novice
Number of posts : 54 Age : 45
Subject: Re: Machine Head Tue Oct 11, 2011 2:47 pm
I do own the following albums: Burn My Eyes, The More Things Change and The blackening. I would describe them as "utter smurf poo". I need to check also the remaining albums.
Temple of Blood Metal is Forever
Number of posts : 5704 Age : 49
Subject: Re: Machine Head Tue Oct 11, 2011 3:07 pm
MetalGuy71 wrote:
I'll stick with the lone album I have, Burn My Eyes.
Smart move. It's the only one that is really good.
A Handful of Wayne Metal is Forever
Number of posts : 7685 Age : 45
Subject: Re: Machine Head Tue Oct 11, 2011 3:37 pm
[quote="Mglaffas81"]
ultmetal wrote:
I will not try to label that song anything, other than say that it is complete sh!t.
I don't really consider Disturbed "Nu-Metal", though - Maybe more so in their early days, but their later outputs have completely moved away from any of that - Just check the awesome "Indestructible" - there's no nu-metal AT ALL in that song. Disturbed have vertainly improved in the last few years, "Indestructible" being their best album, in my opinion.
Wow... why would you label that song sh!t? Because of the verse part? That song has an awesome chorus. I actually love this album. To me I thought it was a definate return to form with some new elements added. The most noticeable thing is the overall sound. Machine Head have their own distinctive sound and they completely left that behind for 2 albums. With "Ashes" they brought back their original sound and I think thats what really makes the album. The band just sounds like a monster again. They haven't released a bad album since. I even think the new album is better than the Blackening.
If people are affraid of bands experimenting once in a while then why bother listening to new albums?
_________________
The_Jayroh Metal master
Number of posts : 823 Age : 36
Subject: Re: Machine Head Wed Oct 12, 2011 12:44 am
I used to be really into this bad a while back. I especially remember liking Machine Head when I saw them in Mayhem Fest in 08. There is a lot of things I like about their music, but then there are things I really don't like about them. It's not the screaming etc that gets on my nerves. I just....don't feel anything from them. The focal point is not on the lyrics/vocals for this band obviously, that is something I hear from this band.
The band knows how to write a good riff, but it would be nice if they weren't pissed off for a change. That's my two cents.
Gilbert Metal is Forever
Number of posts : 9948 Age : 49
Subject: Re: Machine Head Wed Oct 12, 2011 1:05 am
I'm still hesitating about buying unto the locust...