Intense Millennium Records to re-release Frontline Catalog

TheNazgul wrote:

Wait. OCI the Hot Topic kids would compare it to White Wizzard. Really? How did they hear White Wizzard? I'm all befuddled.

Just an exaggeration of what hopefully does not come to pass with the retro stuff. Though SW in any retail store at all, especially Hot Topic, is pretty cool tbh.


metalguy

ultmetal wrote:

Sacred Warrior cover



Thoughts?

That's pretty bad...

You don't like the feathers?

Bloodgood art?
http://jamesheruportfolio.carbonmade.com/projects/2662572#2

ultmetal wrote:

Bloodgood art?
http://jamesheruportfolio.carbonmade.com/projects/2662572#2

Lots of cool artwork. The Bloodgood Detonation art is impressive, but (as I am sure most of the diehards will agree) I prefer the original artwork.

Another cover that is fine as it is, so why change it? Why spend money on new art when they can use the originals? Spend more money on the remastering or booklets instead.

TheNazgul wrote:

You don't like the feathers?

I don't like the fact that it has absolutely nothing to do with the album. I really like the cover to the original: it's simple and to the point.

ultmetal wrote:

Bloodgood art?
http://jamesheruportfolio.carbonmade.com/projects/2662572#2

The Bloodgood cover is at least decent enough. Not great, but way better than the other covers.

Dave the Boss wrote:

ultmetal wrote:

Bloodgood art?
http://jamesheruportfolio.carbonmade.com/projects/2662572#2

The Bloodgood cover is at least decent enough. Not great, but way better than the other covers.

I would agree. of all the new covers that is the best one...

Actually, i'm liking that a lot. Not better but it keeps the spirit alive of the orginal.

I don't mind the Detonation cover.... though is it meant to be a figure swinging a hammer -or something else I'm not seeing? I do like the new Sacred Warrior logo, but might have preferred the Master's Command version. Whilst I 'get' the concept of the cover, I'm not sure it's stylistically right.