CA allows g4y marriage

Road Warrior Number of posts : 17180 Age : 48

scottmitchell74 wrote:: He is completely missing the point. He's using slavery and ethnicity issues to make a point....and he's reaching.....because those people were still marrying (or desiring to marry) someone from the opposite sex.

DB is right. They can still be together. Olberman is trying to make it seem like ghey people can never be together.

Olberman is also WILDLY misquoting The Bible. As usual.

He and Maher are the two most insufferable babblers out there.

I agree! They are desperate to compare this with ethnicity to get a foot hold and it's nowhere near the same as what the Blacks had to go through. Gays have never been enslaved like blacks so the comparison is insulting.

Road Warrior Number of posts : 17180 Age : 48

He's saying why should we care? Why should he?? I bet he doesn't mind his wallet getting fat from the rich and influential gays that prepared his speech. Laughing

Guest

troublezone wrote:

scottmitchell74 wrote:: He is completely missing the point. He's using slavery and ethnicity issues to make a point....and he's reaching.....because those people were still marrying (or desiring to marry) someone from the opposite sex.

DB is right. They can still be together. Olberman is trying to make it seem like ghey people can never be together.

Olberman is also WILDLY misquoting The Bible. As usual.

He and Maher are the two most insufferable babblers out there.

I agree! They are desperate to compare this with ethnicity to get a foot hold and it's nowhere near the same as what the Blacks had to go through. Gays have never been enslaved like blacks so the comparison is insulting.

Gays had the luxury of not being a certain color. If gays were blue, rest assured they'd have been treated just like blacks.

Of course, this has nothing to do with color. It has to do with discrimination.

Ate his vegetables Number of posts : 4958 Age : 34

Eyesore wrote:: If gays were blue, rest assured they'd have been treated just like blacks.

Probably worse, because on top of being blue, they're g4y!

mini boss Number of posts : 21101 Age : 54

troublezone wrote:: He's saying why should we care? Why should he?? I bet he doesn't mind his wallet getting fat from the rich and influential gays that prepared his speech.

A merry prepared his speech? Which one? Their are only a few million gays in the United States, could you narrow it down to one specific merry person or is there a commite of gays who write speeches for Oberman?

Subject: Re: CA allows g4y marriage Mon Nov 24, 2008 9:35 pm

I thought news was suppose to be unbiased. So much for that.

mini boss Number of posts : 21101 Age : 54

Olberman is a political commentator much like Rush Limbaugh and we all know how unbiase he is.

Zooey Addict Number of posts : 17074 Age : 45

xyz wrote:: I thought news was suppose to be unbiased. So much for that.

Thats Keith Olberman, he is NEVER unbiased. He is a liberal equivalent to a Rush Limbaguh or a Shawn Hannity. The only difference is those two readily admit to being biased, Oberman wants people to believe he is a moderate.

Guest

Keith Olberman is just another human with a big mouth who thinks his opinions matters more than yours. He enjoys a paycheck, so he is as extreme as he can be.

Subject: Re: CA allows g4y marriage Mon Nov 24, 2008 9:59 pm

So no one gets mad:

CA allows g4y marriage - Page 11 O_reilly_Factor

Guest

They both are idiots.

mini boss Number of posts : 21101 Age : 54

I like Olberman, don't spend a lot of time watching his show, but when I do tune in I enjoy his show.

Rush Limbaugh my hero, I wish I could have three failed marriages and a drug problems, I would hate to waste all that talent that is on loan from God.

Ate his vegetables Number of posts : 4958 Age : 34

I bet none of those guys even voted.

mini boss Number of posts : 21101 Age : 54

spectrefate wrote:: They both are idiots.

No they are both genius's, they get paid millions of dollars for spouting off their opinions. How do you get a gig like that?

Guest

Good point. But they're still idiots.

Zooey Addict Number of posts : 17074 Age : 45

I like Rush myself, but admit that he has his problems (and I guarantee he does too). I'ts all a matter of ones opinons and Lord knows there are a plethora of them here. I have let my feelings on the subject of ghey marriage be known and thats all I can do. Nobody is changing anybody's opinon with this thread and it's just becoming an endless back and forth disscussion (and I believe some people's feathers are getting a little fluffed-though we have remained civil to each other thus far). Like the Obama Vs. McCain thread I am going to move away from this topic on to greener pastures. See y'all around and keep up the civility my metal brothers.

mini boss Number of posts : 21101 Age : 54

I am with Dallas Black I am done with this thread, we are not going to change anybody's mind.

Master Sailboat Number of posts : 9301 Age : 45

manny wrote:: I am with Dallas Black I am done with this thread, we are not going to change anybody's mind.

you initially expected to?

_________________
CA allows g4y marriage - Page 11 MNxjcKm

Master Of The Crotch Grab Number of posts : 6841 Age : 50

mc666 wrote:

manny wrote:: I am with Dallas Black I am done with this thread, we are not going to change anybody's mind.

you initially expected to?

*rimshot*

mini boss Number of posts : 21101 Age : 54

No I am not that naive, but I am surprised that so many people are opposed to something that will not effect them in any way what so ever. It will not effect the size of their wallet, their marriage, their property values, etc.

I personally don't have a problem with two people getting married no matter what the sexual preference and I don't really understand why anyone would or for that matter why would anyone care, live and let live.

Master Of The Crotch Grab Number of posts : 6841 Age : 50

manny wrote:: No I am not that naive, but I am surprised that so many people are opposed to something that will not effect them in any way what so ever. It will not effect the size of their wallet, their marriage, their property values, etc.

I personally don't have a problem with two people getting married no matter what the sexual preference and I don't really understand why anyone would or for that matter why would anyone care, live and let live.

I dont care if they get married, and as long as its not IN a church, the religious right should just shut up.

Road Warrior Number of posts : 17180 Age : 48

manny wrote:

troublezone wrote:: He's saying why should we care? Why should he?? I bet he doesn't mind his wallet getting fat from the rich and influential gays that prepared his speech.

A merry prepared his speech? Which one? Their are only a few million gays in the United States, could you narrow it down to one specific merry person or is there a commite of gays who write speeches for Oberman?

Maybe i should say they influenced him not wrote it for him.

Road Warrior Number of posts : 17180 Age : 48

manny wrote:: No I am not that naive, but I am surprised that so many people are opposed to something that will not effect them in any way what so ever. It will not effect the size of their wallet, their marriage, their property values, etc.

I personally don't have a problem with two people getting married no matter what the sexual preference and I don't really understand why anyone would or for that matter why would anyone care, live and let live.

This has become a bandwagon that is cool to jump on these days. I'm pretty sure most that are speaking up for this wouldn't of 10 or 20 years ago. For me this is a morality issue... I'm all for live and let live but not when the left force their agenda on a established institution.

Guest

manny wrote:: No I am not that naive, but I am surprised that so many people are opposed to something that will not effect them in any way what so ever. It will not effect the size of their wallet, their marriage, their property values, etc.

I personally don't have a problem with two people getting married no matter what the sexual preference and I don't really understand why anyone would or for that matter why would anyone care, live and let live.

It's because lots of people hate butt sex. Imagine if this was just an issue of two women wanting to marry. Oh, right, it wouldn't be an issue then.

Guest

troublezone wrote:

manny wrote:: No I am not that naive, but I am surprised that so many people are opposed to something that will not effect them in any way what so ever. It will not effect the size of their wallet, their marriage, their property values, etc.

I personally don't have a problem with two people getting married no matter what the sexual preference and I don't really understand why anyone would or for that matter why would anyone care, live and let live.

This has become a bandwagon that is cool to jump on these days. I'm pretty sure most that are speaking up for this wouldn't of 10 or 20 years ago. For me this is a morality issue... I'm all for live and let live but not when the left force their agenda on a established institution.

Where's the morality in denying someone a freedom that so many others have?