46

I already miss getting called the official approved canon of derogatory terms set forth by the (DOFEWD) Department of F Everyone Who Disgrees.

The only issue we’ve had here is political differences.

We all pretty much get along just fine.

I’m sick of the woke “antifa” trolls that go around trying to divide people with fabricated accusations.

Guys, I truly believe he was the poster here Vexed6. Check out that profile and see all he posted. Its almost copy and paste rhetoric.

007 wrote:

Guys, I truly believe he was the poster here Vexed6. Check out that profile and see all he posted. Its almost copy and paste rhetoric.

I believe you. But I can’t find what you’re seeing. Can you copy and paste something back here?

I couldn't find it either, but I'm sure you're right. Glad he's gone, but I'm sure he'll be back. They always come back one way or another. Actually surprised that flat earther retard hasn't made a new account yet.

007 wrote:

https://heartofmetal.niceboard.com/spa/Vexer6

I think you’re right.

It’s probably him!

He thinks HoM is some kind of neo-Nazi website.

Vexer6/blazingstone makes outspoken lefty Sebastian Bach look like Ted Nugent.

This kid is sick! In a bad way...

Could be him, but this new incarnation seems to be a more angry and much more aggressive little troll. This one cursed a lot more that's for sure, but for sure have the same writing style.

Last year I watched an interview from 1984 with Yuri Bezmenov.

Check it out, it pretty much surmised what is taking place in Europe and USA for the past few decades verbatim.

YouTube doesn't get visits from me anymore due to their censorship, so I am not doing the hyperlink thing. The video is on there though.

Interesting stuff

As for it being Vexer6 ?

My curiosity leans more towards whom blazingstone didn't attack, even though that member said things in back and forths that set blazingstone off when others said it or much less, confronted blazingstone in any manner whatsoever. This member has priors for calling adversaries "Nazis" and for the most part, was absent here during the adventures with blazingstone timeline.

People don't always talk the same, but they write the same for the most part. Sentence structure, syntax, diction, verbiage, and the choice of colloquial versus conversational or combination of the two.

So was blazingstone an alias for a current member that hasn't been previously banned?

Another tactic getting rammed down our throats and too many people remain oblivious. Is the use of a Hegelian Dialectic by our government, both parties are guilty as charged.

EDIT: Usually my preference is for people to research for themselves.
But cannot take for granted that people have the time to, want to or even like to do any of that stuff

So in a nut shell a Hegelian Dialectic is basically as follows... Purposely inventing/designing a problem and/ or crisis with a predetermined solution.

Another curiosity I have about another member possibly using an alias is one that said they were not coming back at the New Year and did at the end of April. In which they made an interesting admission that could be connected to the appearance of blazingstone in early February.

The possibilities are endless

James B. wrote:

Another curiosity I have about another member possibly using an alias is one that said they were not coming back at the New Year and did at the end of April. In which they made an interesting admission that could be connected to the appearance of blazingstone in early February.  

The possibilities are endless

I actually thought the same thing.

James B. wrote:

Another curiosity I have about another member possibly using an alias is one that said they were not coming back at the New Year and did at the end of April. In which they made an interesting admission that could be connected to the appearance of blazingstone in early February.  

The possibilities are endless

Haha, at first I thought you might have been thinking I was the one with the troll account. Mostly because you said something about one member hasn't been attacked by the troll, and from what I have read of his posts, he hasn't really gone after me, even when I call him out. Now I think I know who you're thinking. Might be right, but I hope not, kinda like him and wish he'd come back.

My "curiosity" mentioned above is regarding two different members .

In the grand scheme of things, it really don't matter. I have only conjecture, speculation, and some circumstantial bread crumbs. Thought it would be fun to do some kind of "who dunnit" trip, but probably shouldn't go there. Puts folks on edge, the butt-hurt thing happens, and in the end...  Someone returns with a new moniker or someone leaves. Have no control of the former, but not kewl being complicit in the latter.

Well trust me, if I am one of your suspects, you can rest assured I'm not the troll you're looking for. I would totally curse myself out if I had a troll account.

I don’t think anthrax_fan is a suspect. He never cursed like a sailor.

This mystery is like a episode of Scooby Doo. Lol

Wrecked Neck wrote:

Well trust me, if I am one of your suspects, you can rest assured I'm not the troll you're looking for. I would totally curse myself out if I had a troll account.

You don't have priors for calling anyone a nazi...
You never said your were leaving and not coming back...

(IMHDO) A person uses an alias for two, maybe three reasons...

They don't have the balls to say something otherwise?
They don't want to risk losing the persona they've invested so much time creating in an online community by getting banned?
They are off their meds or over indulging in self-medication?

James B. wrote:

Wrecked Neck wrote:

Well trust me, if I am one of your suspects, you can rest assured I'm not the troll you're looking for. I would totally curse myself out if I had a troll account.

You don't have priors for calling anyone a nazi...
You never said your were leaving and not coming back...

(IMHDO) A person uses an alias for two, maybe three reasons...

They don't have the balls to say something otherwise?
They don't want to risk losing the persona they've invested so much time creating in an online community by getting banned?
They are off their meds or over indulging in self-medication?

This person is also an “activist minded” individual most likely from a BLM/Antifa hotspot. Sometimes they inadvertently reveal where they are from. It’s a clue.

Seattle, Portland or Minneapolis are good examples.

James B. wrote:

A person uses an alias for two, maybe three reasons...

They don't have the balls to say something otherwise?
They don't want to risk losing the persona they've invested so much time creating in an online community by getting banned?
They are off their meds or over indulging in self-medication?

Or you could be totally wrong and blazestone was someone new.. a troll perhaps.. I have a lot of far left friends who are trolling everywhere Trumpers exist.. then again I know some moderate Bush/Cheney republicans saying the same things blazestone said about Trumpers …

TZ wrote:

This person is also an “activist minded” individual most likely from a BLM/Antifa hotspot. Sometimes they inadvertently reveal where they are from. It’s a clue.

Seattle, Portland or Minneapolis are good examples.

maybe or it could be a disgruntled Qclown.. I hear a lot of those Q conspiracists Are not happy with the way things have turned out ..

brokentulsa wrote:

Or you could be totally wrong and blazestone was someone new.. a troll perhaps.

Notice I was replying to a board member who was referring to what they would do it they used an alias. So that is what we happened to be talking about, an alas. Others, including myself, have brought up blazingstone being somebody new.

The thing is, blazingstone didn't do his dog and pony show to everyone with a different opinion than them. That is something a totally new person would do. The focus of attack would be on "what".  It wasn't.

Another blazingstone characteristic (in connection with the above) was using past tense in the familiar. The focus of attack was on "who". Something a new person wouldn't do on account of it implying previous interaction.

Like you said, I could be totally wrong.
I could be blazingstone...
You could be blazingstone..
The possibilities are endless

You are him!!! James B. The Nazi scumbag POS troll!!!! Oh wait, I think it's the Nazi loving asshat TroubleZone, always thought there was something strange about that dude.