Which Era Do You LIke Best? (Volume 1)

Starting of with Sodom, "aus dem Ruhrpott"

Make your choice based on recorded output, for example, Demo, E.P, Full Length  Live, Split, or Compilation.

Option 1: 1983 to 1989
Option 2: 1990 to 1999
Option 3: 2000 to 2009
Option 4: 2010 to Present

Lots to dig...Lots to kinda/sorta chuckle at...and definitely lots to digest.

2000-2009

Voted 90-99 but my favorite albums run from 89-2001

I only ever listened to Agent Orange. They didn't win me over completely, so I didn't follow up.

I picked 1990-1999, but I didn't realize this was about Sodom. I don't know shit about Sodom. I have one album, Get What You Deserve, which looks like it came out in 1994, so I guess I voted right after all. Haha.

Eyesore wrote:

I picked 1990-1999, but I didn't realize this was about Sodom. I don't know shit about Sodom. I have one album, Get What You Deserve, which looks like it came out in 1994, so I guess I voted right after all. Haha.

Maybe you'll get a participation trophy 

Funny how an individual of Ken's "belief system" voted before reading anything
Afterall, "Sodom" is referenced in first sentence of initial post. Not to mention, "Sodom" is in every option of the poll.

I have a theory

James B. wrote:

Funny how an individual of Ken's "belief system" voted before reading anything
Afterall, "Sodom" is referenced in first sentence of initial post. Not to mention, "Sodom" is in every option of the poll.

I have a theory

Still bummed that your red wave turned out to be more Kool-Aid, bud?

Eyesore wrote:

Still bummed that your red wave turned out to be more Kool-Aid, bud?

Heard they're auditioning for a new Star Trek movie. You'd be perfect for the part of a "deflector array".

Anyways, not bummed bout nothing. I look at big picture stuff. Check out what happened in over 30 State Legislatures. Real change comes from the bottom up. Lots of school boards flipped as well on the local level, nationally. Things are looking better than they were.

You be you bud, keep thinking the us-vs-them dynamic between establishment politicians (Republican/Democrat) is real

America First

Every flavor of Corporate Media pushed both sides of the "red wave" narrative. Imagine that, sponsored by Pfizer of course.

James B. wrote:

Eyesore wrote:

Still bummed that your red wave turned out to be more Kool-Aid, bud?

Heard they're auditioning for a new Star Trek movie. You'd be perfect for the part of a "deflector array".

Anyways, not bummed bout nothing. I look at big picture stuff. Check out what happened in over 30 State Legislatures. Real change comes from the bottom up. Lots of school boards flipped as well on the local level, nationally. Things are looking better than they were.

You be you bud, keep thinking the us-vs-them dynamic between establishment politicians (Republican/Democrat) is real

America First

Every flavor of Corporate Media pushed both sides of the "red wave" narrative. Imagine that, sponsored by Pfizer of course.

Dude, I skimmed a meaningless post and missed something, and you had to go make it political and basically call me a stupid liberal. But sure, I'm the one who thinks it's "us versus them."

Eyesore wrote:

Dude, I skimmed a meaningless post and missed something, and you had to go make it political and basically call me a stupid liberal. But sure, I'm the one who thinks it's "us versus them."

I made fun of you for not reading something before you voted.  

Then you bring up "your red wave"  So who actually  made it political?  

If I thought you were a stupid liberal, I would actually say that. Lots of proof of me saying what I think about you and things you have posted.  Again, you do what you do. Put word in people's mouths.  Other members here have you called out on it, so it is nothing new.

You "stepped down" (voluntarily or otherwise) as Administrator. So now we won't have long gone or obscure board members magically appear out of thin air to reply to certain topics.  

Quite interesting that does not happen anymore

James B. wrote:

Eyesore wrote:

Dude, I skimmed a meaningless post and missed something, and you had to go make it political and basically call me a stupid liberal. But sure, I'm the one who thinks it's "us versus them."

I made fun of you for not reading something before you voted.  

Then you bring up "your red wave"  So who actually  made it political?  

If I thought you were a stupid liberal, I would actually say that. Lots of proof of me saying what I think about you and things you have posted.  Again, you do what you do. Put word in people's mouths.  Other members here have you called out on it, so it is nothing new.

You "stepped down" (voluntarily or otherwise) as Administrator. So now we won't have long gone or obscure board members magically appear out of thin air to reply to certain topics.  

Quite interesting that does not happen anymore

Right, I'm sure "Funny how an individual of Ken's "belief system" voted before reading anything" had nothing to do with politics.

And...what? You think I'm posting under other accounts? Because I've ever been concerned about what I say under this account. Hilarious stuff, buddy.

And FYI, if that were true, wouldn't I still be able to post under those accounts?

Eyesore wrote:

Right, I'm sure "Funny how an individual of Ken's "belief system" voted before reading anything" had nothing to do with politics.

Nope, that was your interpretation of it. Voting and beliefs are not mutually exclusive to politics. 

So let's say, a poll was made: "What is your favorite NFL team? "
You come along and vote, "Redsox" without reading  anything.
My statement of "Funny how an individual of Ken' s belief system voted without reading anything" still applies. Nothing political implied, nor intended.

I purposely didn't include "belief system" in my above reply to you because it was obvious you would come back to that. You are too easy.

You assumed I made it political,  but you actually did make it that. Oh well.

Eyesore wrote:

And...what? You think I'm posting under other accounts?    Because I've ever been concerned about what I say under this account. Hilarious stuff, buddy.

And FYI, if that were true, wouldn't I still be able to post under those accounts?  

Nope, I think I you "were" posting under other accohnts, past tense.

Concern about what you say on any account is irrelevant, you're own admission of "Breakg  Balls" could be reason enough, who knows?

As to "wouldn't I still be able to post under those accounts?" I do not know what you are able or unable to do as a regular board member or an Administrator for that matter.

What I do know... I mention that certain posts had been changed by certain people without editing notifications in a thread topic. Shortly afterwards, you are no longer an Administrator.  Connected, who really knows? Then... After you are no longer an Administrator, certain members are no longer posting. They happen to be same members with changing posts, mentioned above. Those same members had been absent for a substantial period of time, and suddenly they start posting again in certain topics. Connected? Who really knows? 

People can change what they say, but usually the way they say it, doesn't.
The sudden command of a written foreign language is odd in itself. Then you have members forgetting things they posted in the past that normally do not get forgotten easily. It goes on and on.

But hey, I could be wrong
Would not be the first time. Also, I do not have a problem admitting it.
You on the other hand, have a jacket.
Wear it proudly buddy!

James B. wrote:

Eyesore wrote:

Right, I'm sure "Funny how an individual of Ken's "belief system" voted before reading anything" had nothing to do with politics.

Nope, that was your interpretation of it. Voting and beliefs are not mutually exclusive to politics. 

So let's say, a poll was made: "What is your favorite NFL team? "
You come along and vote, "Redsox" without reading  anything.
My statement of "Funny how an individual of Ken' s belief system voted without reading anything" still applies. Nothing political implied, nor intended.

I purposely didn't include "belief system" in my above reply to you because it was obvious you would come back to that. You are too easy.

You assumed I made it political,  but you actually did make it that. Oh well.

Sure. So what "belief system" were you referring to then?

James B. wrote:

Eyesore wrote:

And...what? You think I'm posting under other accounts?    Because I've ever been concerned about what I say under this account. Hilarious stuff, buddy.

And FYI, if that were true, wouldn't I still be able to post under those accounts?  

Nope, I think I you "were" posting under other accohnts, past tense.

Concern about what you say on any account is irrelevant, you're own admission of "Breakg  Balls" could be reason enough, who knows?

As to "wouldn't I still be able to post under those accounts?" I do not know what you are able or unable to do as a regular board member or an Administrator for that matter.

What I do know... I mention that certain posts had been changed by certain people without editing notifications in a thread topic. Shortly afterwards, you are no longer an Administrator.  Connected, who really knows? Then... After you are no longer an Administrator, certain members are no longer posting. They happen to be same members with changing posts, mentioned above. Those same members had been absent for a substantial period of time, and suddenly they start posting again in certain topics. Connected? Who really knows? 

People can change what they say, but usually the way they say it, doesn't.
The sudden command of a written foreign language is odd in itself. Then you have members forgetting things they posted in the past that normally do not get forgotten easily. It goes on and on.

But hey, I could be wrong
Would not be the first time. Also, I do not have a problem admitting it.
You on the other hand, have a jacket.
Wear it proudly buddy!

Well, first off, I never edited anyone's posts ever. Second, you can edit a post and it won't show that it's been edited unless someone else posts after. Third, I removed myself as an admin because I was going to leave the forum because you and a few other have essentially ruined it with your bullshit.

As for the rest of what you said, it's just typical conspiracy-theory nonsense that's to be expected from people like you. Think what you want. My comments in those political posts were few and far between because I don't give a shit and rarely went in there, not because I'm posting under other accounts. Any remaining admin here is more than welcome to compare IP address and the like. Have at it.

Hey Ken:

As far my BS goes, people make a choice to read it, reply to it, or ignore it. Just like you made a choice to be butt-hurt about it.

I can hear you now, "mommy, someone is saying something I don't  agree with on the interwebs. Make me some hot cocoa and put on your Def Leppard "Hysteria" album."

If people like me are so beneath you, why bother defending yourself to anything I say. Afterall, it is just a meaningless post, right?

Sure is funny as hell that you responded about a half a dozen times to my BS in this thread alone. 


ISP #'s can be gotten around for years now. I already said what I "think"  and pretty much implied things are possibly connected, but not provable.

Oh yeah, regarding the selective editing mentioned. Someone did post afterwards.  So there is that.

I may be right? I may be wrong? I do not know?
I do know you would never cop to it.

Voted '90 to '99, but I enjoy pretty much everything they've done.

As to everything else, you two gonna fight or fuck? I mean, I'll watch either way, just wanna know what kind of popcorn to bring...

James B. wrote:

Hey Ken:

As far my BS goes, people make a choice to read it, reply to it, or ignore it. Just like you made a choice to be butt-hurt about it.

I can hear you now, "mommy, someone is saying something I don't  agree with on the interwebs. Make me some hot cocoa and put on your Def Leppard "Hysteria" album."

If people like me are so beneath you, why bother defending yourself to anything I say. Afterall, it is just a meaningless post, right?

Sure is funny as hell that you responded about a half a dozen times to my BS in this thread alone. 


ISP #'s can be gotten around for years now. I already said what I "think"  and pretty much implied things are possibly connected, but not provable.

Oh yeah, regarding the selective editing mentioned. Someone did post afterwards.  So there is that.

I may be right? I may be wrong? I do not know?
I do know you would never cop to it.

God, you are pathetic.

Eyesore wrote:

God, you are pathetic.

Still you choose to click, read, and respond?

Eyesore wrote:

God, you are pathetic.

Kind of like threatening to leave a message board cause people said something you disagree with?

Eyesore wrote:

God, you are pathetic.

 
You forgot the most important part, "In My Opinion"
 "pathetic" in any context, is an adjective.
Furthermore non-superlative,  thus totally objective.

James B. wrote:

Eyesore wrote:

God, you are pathetic.

Kind of like threatening to leave a message board cause people said something you disagree with?

Did I threaten to do that? I only mentioned it briefly yesterday. It was months ago when I decided I was going to leave. Not because anyone disagreed with me, but simply because it wasn't fun anymore. Look around—TONS of people have left this forum. Likely for the same reason. My very brief stroll through your political nonsense had nothing to do with it.

Semantics anyone? Applied to opening question in reply.

Then we have you "briefly" saying "because of people like you and your bullshit"
Which in part and/or in whole (you choose)  coincide with you disagreeing with me or somebody else. 

Fun is what people make it. (IMHDO)
And... Of course very subjective.
Sorry for having fun in a manner that is unacceptable to you, buddy.

You are right about something! 
All of this is meaningless B/S...
....Every opinion on music, politics, movies, television,, or whatever else gets posted on here.

So glad (I mean really glad) you are here to tell us what is and what isn't "nonsense", political aside of course. That characteristic iand/or burden is mine and mine alone.
.
Thank You, Ken. Very, very much. Your participation is deeply appreciated.

If anyone leaves this forum because of someone else’s political opinions, then they are a spineless dipshit. Good riddance!

We have plenty of other threads and topics to participate in. Stay the F out of a thread that might offend you (if you can’t handle it). We should not be censored or stifled here. Some folks have chosen to leave because they could not dominate over others the way they thought they could… others just simply got bored and lost interest. And some took a lengthy sabbatical.

If you are someone that gets upset easily over political sparring, do as Fat Freddy does and stay out of those conversations. Go to your “safe place”.