| In Flames...WHY!? | |
|
+11kmorg Ben Grimm mc666 exact33 Lurideath Shawn Of Fire Mglaffas81 rawr! The_Jayroh GrandNational metalhead777 15 posters |
Author | Message |
---|
metalhead777 Metal master
Number of posts : 842 Age : 34
| Subject: In Flames...WHY!? Tue Jun 28, 2011 12:39 am | |
| WHY! Why cant they just go back to the good old Melo-death days instead of this metalcore crap? From everything I'v heard from the new album its just a more mainstream version of the crap the'v been shoveling for the past decade.
It almost makes me happy that At The Gates broke up,I would hate to see what they could have turned into if at the gates has turned out like this. | |
|
| |
GrandNational Metal is in my blood
Number of posts : 3830 Age : 44
| Subject: Re: In Flames...WHY!? Tue Jun 28, 2011 2:14 am | |
| Why ask why? Try Bud Dry. | |
|
| |
Guest Guest
| Subject: Re: In Flames...WHY!? Tue Jun 28, 2011 2:32 am | |
| - GrandNational wrote:
- Why ask why? Try Bud Dry.
now that's a blast from failed marketing past! |
|
| |
The_Jayroh Metal master
Number of posts : 823 Age : 36
| Subject: Re: In Flames...WHY!? Tue Jun 28, 2011 2:48 am | |
| I kind of gave up on In Flames a while back, although I do enjoy their older material more than the newer. I don't think it's the style I don't like. It's just the songwriting that is seriously suffering. | |
|
| |
rawr! Metal graduate
Number of posts : 372 Age : 38
| Subject: Re: In Flames...WHY!? Tue Jun 28, 2011 5:50 am | |
| dont forget soilwork... | |
|
| |
Mglaffas81 Heart of Metal
Number of posts : 2256 Age : 40
| Subject: Re: In Flames...WHY!? Tue Jun 28, 2011 7:22 am | |
| - The_Jayroh wrote:
- I kind of gave up on In Flames a while back, although I do enjoy their older material more than the newer. I don't think it's the style I don't like. It's just the songwriting that is seriously suffering.
Agree about the songwriting - but the style ain't really my thing either. In Flames were really good MUSICALLY on the first 4 albums, then it started getting boring. I never liked the vocals, Ander Friden really gets on my nerves.
Last edited by Mglaffas81 on Tue Jun 28, 2011 7:40 am; edited 1 time in total | |
|
| |
Shawn Of Fire Metal is Forever
Number of posts : 6719 Age : 53
| Subject: Re: In Flames...WHY!? Tue Jun 28, 2011 7:30 am | |
| Post Clayman, In Flames ceases to matter to me... _________________ FINAL SIGN
| |
|
| |
Lurideath Metal is in my blood
Number of posts : 3908 Age : 52
| Subject: Re: In Flames...WHY!? Tue Jun 28, 2011 12:23 pm | |
| I stopped caring after I heard Whoracle. I knew it was down hill from that album and to me it was. | |
|
| |
exact33 The King
Number of posts : 23281 Age : 51
| Subject: Re: In Flames...WHY!? Tue Jun 28, 2011 12:37 pm | |
| Reroute to Remain was when i hopped off the bandwagon... _________________ | |
|
| |
mc666 Master Sailboat
Number of posts : 9301 Age : 45
| Subject: Re: In Flames...WHY!? Tue Jun 28, 2011 1:25 pm | |
| The Jester Race was top notch. steady decline after that. _________________ | |
|
| |
Ben Grimm Metal graduate
Number of posts : 450 Age : 49
| Subject: Re: In Flames...WHY!? Tue Jun 28, 2011 3:26 pm | |
| I like the newer stuff, but I did not discover them until Come Clarity. In the back catalog anything before Colony I can't get into. | |
|
| |
kmorg Metal is my Life
Number of posts : 13862 Age : 49
| Subject: Re: In Flames...WHY!? Tue Jun 28, 2011 3:33 pm | |
| I've liked everything up 'til the new one. They are not exactly metalcore nowadays though.... _________________ | |
|
| |
A Handful of Wayne Metal is Forever
Number of posts : 7685 Age : 45
| Subject: Re: In Flames...WHY!? Tue Jun 28, 2011 4:52 pm | |
| Went to a few cd stores this weekend. I saw this new album and the new Queensryche for the first time I past both of them up. _________________ | |
|
| |
The_Jayroh Metal master
Number of posts : 823 Age : 36
| Subject: Re: In Flames...WHY!? Tue Jun 28, 2011 5:31 pm | |
| - Ben Grimm wrote:
- I like the newer stuff, but I did not discover them until Come Clarity. In the back catalog anything before Colony I can't get into.
Same here! I actually liked some songs off Come Clarity, but it was like when I heard Metallica's Black Album before the rest of their catalog. The older stuff just sounded so much better to me that I stopped paying as much attention to the newer stuff. Clayman is the drop off point to me, and even at that I still don't listen to In Flames very much. I actually bought A Sense of Purpose when it was new, and have since sold it back. There was one good song, Alias, and the rest just didn't do anything for me. | |
|
| |
SideShowDisaSter Roo Jockey
Number of posts : 4609 Age : 46
| Subject: Re: In Flames...WHY!? Wed Jun 29, 2011 6:26 am | |
| - mc666 wrote:
- The Jester Race was top notch. steady decline after that.
QFT _________________ You're cancer, you can't be the answer, you're killing me
| |
|
| |
Eyesore Metal is my Life
Number of posts : 12815 Age : 49
| Subject: Re: In Flames...WHY!? Wed Jun 29, 2011 8:51 pm | |
| - metalhead777 wrote:
- WHY! Why cant they just go back to the good old Melo-death days instead of this metalcore crap? From everything I'v heard from the new album its just a more mainstream version of the crap the'v been shoveling for the past decade.
It almost makes me happy that At The Gates broke up,I would hate to see what they could have turned into if at the gates has turned out like this. They have been playing this style of music now for longer than they did the previous, more melodeath style. So the question shouldn't be Why can't In Flames go back to that style, but Why can't people stop whining and listening to bands they no longer like!Sorry. It had to be said. Haha. I just don't get this kind of reaction fans have. In Flames has changed. Why can't so-called fans let it go? | |
|
| |
Gilbert Metal is Forever
Number of posts : 9948 Age : 49
| Subject: Re: In Flames...WHY!? Thu Jun 30, 2011 12:57 am | |
| The new material sucks. Of course, when Metal Hammer claims it's going to be a super album, i already know it's a failure | |
|
| |
exact33 The King
Number of posts : 23281 Age : 51
| |
| |
Sponsored content
| Subject: Re: In Flames...WHY!? | |
| |
|
| |
| In Flames...WHY!? | |
|