Taco Bell Sued Over "Beef"

I don't know how anyone could eat Taco Hell.

And after I saw Super-Size Me a few years ago, I find Mickey-Dee's, Slopper-Whopp [Sorry Alex], and all the rest pretty disgusting too.

I still eat like crap - I just do it at home with all my mega-processed microwave chow.

Excuse me, but where in the article does it say anything about their "beef" only being made of 35% real beef? I can't seem to find it...

Mglaffas81 wrote:

Excuse me, but where in the article does it say anything about their "beef" only being made of 35% real beef? I can't seem to find it...

Freakin' Yahoo constantly edits their articles. It used to say there was only 35% beef but apparently it's been changed since I originally posted the link.

Here in the Buffalo area you go to Mighty Taco, not Taco Bell. Way better.

BTW, ever notice why Kentucky Fried Chicken is called KFC now and not the full name - hmmm............

Purportedly KFC didn't like the "Fried" part of their name; they wanted to project a more healthy image.

tohostudios wrote:

they wanted to project a more healthy image.

Then they came out with this.....




To me, there is nothing more repulsive than Kentucky Fried Chicken.

SpectreFate wrote:

tohostudios wrote:

they wanted to project a more healthy image.

Then they came out with this.....




To me, there is nothing more repulsive than Kentucky Fried Chicken.

If they left the breading off, that would be the ultimate Atkins lunch!!!!!

SpectreFate wrote:

tohostudios wrote:

they wanted to project a more healthy image.

Then they came out with this.....




To me, there is nothing more repulsive than Kentucky Fried Chicken.

That thing is definitely disgusting.

I haven't had fried anything in literally decades.

tohostudios wrote:

SpectreFate wrote:

tohostudios wrote:

they wanted to project a more healthy image.

Then they came out with this.....




To me, there is nothing more repulsive than Kentucky Fried Chicken.

That thing is definitely disgusting.

I haven't had fried anything in literally decades.

It looks disgusting but it tastes HEAVENLY!!!!! They also have one with one piece of chicken between a Hawaiian sweet roll. Damn! Now I'm hungry for one of those!

I remember a comedian talking about how it's just KFC now back in the late 90s. He said, "Maybe they think we'll forget that its fried. 'Hey KFC! that must mean Kolesterol Free Chicken!"

DallasBlack wrote:

tohostudios wrote:

SpectreFate wrote:

tohostudios wrote:

they wanted to project a more healthy image.

Then they came out with this.....




To me, there is nothing more repulsive than Kentucky Fried Chicken.

That thing is definitely disgusting.

I haven't had fried anything in literally decades.

It looks disgusting but it tastes HEAVENLY!!!!! They also have one with one piece of chicken between a Hawaiian sweet roll. Damn! Now I'm hungry for one of those!

I remember a comedian talking about how it's just KFC now back in the late 90s. He said, "Maybe they think we'll forget that its fried. 'Hey KFC! that must mean Kolesterol Free Chicken!"

I'm with you Dallas, those taste GREAT! Make sure to bring your own kit to revive your heart though......

Quote :

To me, there is nothing more repulsive than Kentucky Fried Chicken.

Really? Don't ever log onto my webcam then. The monkeys and I are redifining the word "repulsive" on a nightly basis.

And Taco Bell fights back those allegations...

http://www.comcast.net/articles/finance/20110128/US.Taco.Bell.Lawsuit/

Its not like you ever get to eat the beef you order - they never get the order right...

How could they be sued over their beef? No sane person could consider that beef.