So Murder is bad for Tourism ?

Who would have though, The english rags really do look for a story

http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2010/jul/09/raoul-moat-rothbury-tourism

Locky wrote:

Who would have though, The english rags really do look for a story

http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2010/jul/09/raoul-moat-rothbury-tourism

murder may be bad, but oil slicks are worse

exact33 wrote:

murder may be bad, but oil slicks are worse

Yea you are really getting the shite end of the stick with that, is there any hope of it coming to an end ?

Why are they looking for him in the grass and under rocks? He was a big dude.

Eyesore wrote:

Why are they looking for him in the grass and under rocks? He was a big dude.

The local cops were out of their depth with him, they even had to police cars crash into one another in a village as they were going too hard in the search.

Killing is wrong, and bad. There should be a new, stronger word for
killing... like badwrong, or badong. Yes, killing is badong. From this
moment, I will stand for the opposite of killing - gnodab.

Locky wrote:

Who would have though, The english rags really do look for a story

http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2010/jul/09/raoul-moat-rothbury-tourism

It's an embarassment really. Journalists are so lazy now, I'm sure any sane person could've written that story.

"The people who were due to be here next week have just cancelled because of what has been going on" - Oh no what a disaster!

He's dead now anyway (unfortunate or not), so they have nothing to worry about.

snooloui wrote:

Locky wrote:

Who would have though, The english rags really do look for a story

http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2010/jul/09/raoul-moat-rothbury-tourism

It's an embarassment really. Journalists are so lazy now, I'm sure any sane person could've written that story.

"The people who were due to be here next week have just cancelled because of what has been going on" - Oh no what a disaster!

He's dead now anyway (unfortunate or not), so they have nothing to worry about.

Did he eventually die?

Locky wrote:

exact33 wrote:

murder may be bad, but oil slicks are worse

Yea you are really getting the shite end of the stick with that, is there any hope of it coming to an end ?

yep. it looks like BP finally has their act together.

exact33 wrote:

Locky wrote:

exact33 wrote:

murder may be bad, but oil slicks are worse

Yea you are really getting the shite end of the stick with that, is there any hope of it coming to an end ?

yep. it looks like BP finally has their act together.

Are you joking?



It's obviously not going to end for many many years. Unfortunate, really.

they are saying now that the spill is close to being capped. Of course the environmental affects are not gone...

BP = most epic fail in history, one of at least

My uncle works in the oil industry and he said that even before the spill happened, BP was notorious for valuing cost-cutting over safety. He hates those guys.

Eyesore wrote:

snooloui wrote:

Locky wrote:

Who would have though, The english rags really do look for a story

http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2010/jul/09/raoul-moat-rothbury-tourism

It's an embarassment really. Journalists are so lazy now, I'm sure any sane person could've written that story.

"The people who were due to be here next week have just cancelled because of what has been going on" - Oh no what a disaster!

He's dead now anyway (unfortunate or not), so they have nothing to worry about.

Did he eventually die?

Yea, he shot himself after a stand-off with police. Here's another interesting article on the story.

http://www.comcast.net/articles/news-finance/20100715/EU.Britain.Killer.Facebook/

Apparently, some folks are looking at this guy as some kind of hero. Bizarre.