Sarah Jessica Parker Looks like a Horse

jstate wrote:

Twice in the last year I've heard random people on the street make the same joke when passing a movie poster with SJP on it. SJP walks into a bar and the bartender says why the long face.

Stender wrote:

with a bat...

Jesusandmetal23 wrote:

Stender wrote:

with a bat...

Yeah. I'm pretty liberal with my appraisals of the looks of Hollywood starlets but I just don't get SJP. Ric Flair in drag if you ask me.

There are also certain actresses who only look good when playing a character who doesn't look at all how they actually look.

Charlize Theron (plus I usually hate this kind of haircut, yet..)



Gwyneth Paltrow (typically extremely mehhhhhhhhhhhh)




Scarlett Johansson (the only time she's looked passable)

Orion Crystal Ice wrote:

There are also certain actresses who only look good when playing a character who doesn't look at all how they actually look.


Scarlett Johansson (the only time she's looked passable)

I'm going to have to disagree with you. She looks absolutely perfect in Match Point 10/10.
www.youtube.com/watch?v=qliBw0K4SXo&hd=1 (fast forward to 30 seconds forward)

I agree with you guys on Sarah Jessica Parker. Very very plain indeed.

Jennifer Anniston is slightly above average. I guess I would call her cute.

The one girl that I could never see how people found her attractive was Demi Moore. Very very plain as well.

It depends what you mean by plain, and what's implied through it.. For example, I dislike much makeup, many people would say a woman is plain-looking without it, and I prefer well kept, but not 'made up'. It's when you bring all the distractions and things down to the lowest common denominator that how a woman actually looks and her qualities can be brought out. So I will see ones at the mall or somewhere totally normal, every day, that I think look far better than most actresses. By the same token, I do have preferences to some extent, and the things that those preferences tend to exclude is a skinny blond aryan look of almost any type. I just can't...that's my 'plain'.... but plain in the literal definition, I tend to find full of surprises..

I guess I should clarify my use of plain. I'm describing Demi Moore and SJP as dull or easily lost in a crowd.

Jesusandmetal23 wrote:

Stender wrote:

with a bat...

Hey SJP,

Want some peanut butter?

Orion Crystal Ice wrote:

Scarlett Johansson (the only time she's looked passable)

You're nuts.

This thread gives me hope in humanity. SJP is one of the main offenders of my "how is she a leading actress" question.

Like the Family Guy said "her face looks like a foot."

Aniston on ther other hand, is amazing.

Dave the Boss wrote:

Orion Crystal Ice wrote:

Scarlett Johansson (the only time she's looked passable)

You're nuts.

I actually agree with OCI on this one. I've never thought Scarlet Johansson was all that crash hot. That picture is about the best I've ever seen her.

To the original topic, Sarah Jessica Parker is just plain ugly. She isn't attractive, she can't act to save her life....how the hell has she become an A-list actress?

Quote :

I actually agree with OCI on this one. I've never thought Scarlet Johansson was all that crash hot. That picture is about the best I've ever seen her.

To the original topic, Sarah Jessica Parker is just plain ugly. She isn't attractive, she can't act to save her life....how the hell has she become an A-list actress?

I completely aree with both above statements and can't understand a lot of what people are thinking these days about what makes someone the "it" girl or what constitutes a good actress.

Put me in the Aniston is beautiful camp. Just absolutely gorgeous !


As for Sarah Jessica Parker , well.....

007 wrote:

As for Sarah Jessica Parker , well.....

From the horse's mouth!!!!

I think I saw Sarah Jessica Parker recently - when I went to the Charles Town Races & Slots....... I bet on her to show and she did....

I always called SJP the manliest woman in Hollywood but now i'm feeling kind of sorry for her.

Dude, for being in her 40's Aniston is amazing and Scarlett has classic beauty.

Scarlett is a beautiful woman!!!!

I guess Ferris Bueller has his own tijuana horse show at night!

thejokeriv wrote:

I guess Ferris Bueller has his own tijuana horse show at night!

I wonder who rides who !

Scarlett is INCREDIBLE. (and so is Paltrow while I'm at it)

Scarlett has that old fashioned "Hollywood glamour" that's tough to describe, but you can tell when it's there. She's got it, the camera adores her.

Anyone who didn't want to marry her by the end of Lost In Translation doesn't have a pulse.

detuned wrote:

Jennifer Connelly/Salma Hayek has that old fashioned "Hollywood glamour" that's tough to describe, but you can tell when it's there. She's got it, the camera adores her.

fixed


also SJH seems to have an incredibly irritating personality which counts against her too.

Orion Crystal Ice wrote:

detuned wrote:

Jennifer Connelly/Salma Hayek has that old fashioned "Hollywood glamour" that's tough to describe, but you can tell when it's there. She's got it, the camera adores her.

fixed

Now you are talking some sense. Salma Hayek is near perfect. Still don't agree with you on Scarlett Johansson, but oh well.

Scarlett is HOT!

There are some beautiful women in hollywood, but there are also some who arent that good looking.

Trouble, that Mr. Ed thing CRACKED ME UP!!!!!

Sarah Jessica Parker is hit or miss with me. When she dresses casually and looks like the girl next door, I think she can look as good as anyone. I don't like her look when she coats on the makeup and pulls her hair back. Her best look is with minimal makeup, jeans/slacks, etc... I agree with Metalguy, she was hot as hell in L.A Story. Her hair was consistently curly back in the day, which added to her appeal, whereas she straightens her hair these days, which doesn't work for me.

Reading this was the most fun I've had all day! Thanks guys!

I actually wouldnt hit it, thats just a rad emoticon.


If were talking hyper hot and smart....zooey deschanel.