Subject: Album-VS-Album 1990 (Part 2) Sat Nov 19, 2022 12:31 pm
_________________
007 Metal is my Life
Number of posts : 40887 Age : 56
Subject: Re: Album-VS-Album 1990 (Part 2) Sat Nov 19, 2022 12:45 pm
Never heard the Celtic Frost album, but regardless, I can't go against Painkiller
Required Fields Metal is my Life
Number of posts : 28649 Age : 39
Subject: Re: Album-VS-Album 1990 (Part 2) Sat Nov 19, 2022 1:14 pm
Painkiller, easily.
nevermore Metal is my Life
Number of posts : 26657 Age : 55
Subject: Re: Album-VS-Album 1990 (Part 2) Sat Nov 19, 2022 2:39 pm
Easily Painkiller for me.
Troublezone Road Warrior
Number of posts : 17180 Age : 48
Subject: Re: Album-VS-Album 1990 (Part 2) Sat Nov 19, 2022 9:48 pm
It’s Painkiller! No contest.
It’s one of my favorite albums and my definition of what a heavy metal album is.
Gilbert Metal is Forever
Number of posts : 9948 Age : 49
Subject: Re: Album-VS-Album 1990 (Part 2) Sun Nov 20, 2022 12:15 am
PAINKILLER
Thrasher73 Much Cooler than the other 72
Number of posts : 8918 Age : 51
Subject: Re: Album-VS-Album 1990 (Part 2) Sun Nov 20, 2022 2:20 am
Painkiller
metalken Metal master
Number of posts : 820 Age : 59
Subject: Re: Album-VS-Album 1990 (Part 2) Sun Nov 20, 2022 11:34 am
Painkiller
Lari Metal is Forever
Number of posts : 6393 Age : 44
Subject: Re: Album-VS-Album 1990 (Part 2) Sun Nov 20, 2022 12:15 pm
Weird comparison.
James B. Scurvy Skalliwag
Number of posts : 12851 Age : 60
Subject: Re: Album-VS-Album 1990 (Part 2) Sun Nov 20, 2022 8:43 pm
IMHDO) Painkiller is one of Priest's most forced & contrived albums EVER. Lots of people dig it (cool with me)
Celtic Frost did something different than before to varying degrees, like usual. Thus, my vote.
_________________
Troublezone Road Warrior
Number of posts : 17180 Age : 48
Subject: Re: Album-VS-Album 1990 (Part 2) Sun Nov 20, 2022 11:58 pm
James B. wrote:
IMHDO) Painkiller is one of Priest's most forced & contrived albums EVER. Lots of people dig it (cool with me)
Celtic Frost did something different than before to varying degrees, like usual. Thus, my vote.
I think they were trying to stay relevant in the thrash era. And they did a damn good job! Most dinosaur bands just stay in their lane… I applaud Priest’s effort to progress as musicians. In what way do they sound forced? I’d say Turbo was more out of their element. It was like ZZ Top meets corporate hair metal.
James B. Scurvy Skalliwag
Number of posts : 12851 Age : 60
Subject: Re: Album-VS-Album 1990 (Part 2) Mon Nov 21, 2022 1:38 am
Troublezone wrote:
James B. wrote:
IMHDO) Painkiller is one of Priest's most forced & contrived albums EVER. Lots of people dig it (cool with me)
Celtic Frost did something different than before to varying degrees, like usual. Thus, my vote.
I think they were trying to stay relevant in the thrash era. And they did a damn good job! Most dinosaur bands just stay in their lane… I applaud Priest’s effort to progress as musicians. In what way do they sound forced? I’d say Turbo was more out of their element. It was like ZZ Top meets corporate hair metal.
To your first point: "trying to stay relevant in the thrash era". Wasn't that what they tried to do with both "Turbo" & Ram It Down". Ya know, stay relevant to a current trend? Just "Painkiller" happened to fit right up your alley. As opposed to the previous two?
Your point: "In what way do they sound forced"? When was Priest ever so over the top on an entire album.? Double kick out the wazoo... Super high screams everywhere, and twin shred galore. This "Better, Stronger, Faster" approach appeared to break them apart. That is generally the outcome of forcing something. If everything clicked and gelled, the band sticks together. They did not.
As far as ZZ Top goes, (IMHDO) they took what they did, (blues based hard rock) and tweaked it. Something kind of new, I suppose? IMHDO) Priest went from kinda/sorta innovators in the 70's to trend followers between 1980 & 1990. SFV and parts of DOTF, the exception. We have Kraft Singles American processed cheese with "British Steel" in 80. 1990 is total Cheeze Wizz with "Painkiller".
_________________
Troublezone Road Warrior
Number of posts : 17180 Age : 48
Subject: Re: Album-VS-Album 1990 (Part 2) Mon Nov 21, 2022 3:36 am
James B. wrote:
Troublezone wrote:
James B. wrote:
IMHDO) Painkiller is one of Priest's most forced & contrived albums EVER. Lots of people dig it (cool with me)
Celtic Frost did something different than before to varying degrees, like usual. Thus, my vote.
I think they were trying to stay relevant in the thrash era. And they did a damn good job! Most dinosaur bands just stay in their lane… I applaud Priest’s effort to progress as musicians. In what way do they sound forced? I’d say Turbo was more out of their element. It was like ZZ Top meets corporate hair metal.
To your first point: "trying to stay relevant in the thrash era". Wasn't that what they tried to do with both "Turbo" & Ram It Down". Ya know, stay relevant to a current trend? Just "Painkiller" happened to fit right up your alley. As opposed to the previous two?
Your point: "In what way do they sound forced"? When was Priest ever so over the top on an entire album.? Double kick out the wazoo... Super high screams everywhere, and twin shred galore. This "Better, Stronger, Faster" approach appeared to break them apart. That is generally the outcome of forcing something. If everything clicked and gelled, the band sticks together. They did not.
As far as ZZ Top goes, (IMHDO) they took what they did, (blues based hard rock) and tweaked it. Something kind of new, I suppose? IMHDO) Priest went from kinda/sorta innovators in the 70's to trend followers between 1980 & 1990. SFV and parts of DOTF, the exception. We have Kraft Singles American processed cheese with "British Steel" in 80. 1990 is total Cheeze Wizz with "Painkiller".
I was thinking more along the lines of ZZ Top’s Eliminator synth. It was going more in dance music direction than their traditional headbanging tunes.
Subject: Re: Album-VS-Album 1990 (Part 2) Sat Nov 26, 2022 10:35 pm
James B. wrote:
IMHDO) Painkiller is one of Priest's most forced & contrived albums EVER. Lots of people dig it (cool with me)
This X whatever number you want to enter. I don't dislike Painkiller, but it was the most album forced next to that of Turbo. Priest were the trendsetters, but from 1986-1990 they were sort of followers and jumping on the latest trend. Though I'm a recent convert to Celtic Frost and as much as I like this Frost album, I probably would go with "Painkiller", due to the fact that I've been listening to it since its release. Having said that, I might change my mind tomorrow on this one.