| Bands that started off great BUT... | |
|
+18krokus kmorg stepcousin candlemass mc666 scottmitchell74 Lurideath spiritoradio the sentinel T-Roy Chairman_Smith GrandNational Required Fields MetalGuy71 Temple of Blood SideShowDisaSter Fat Freddy ultmetal 22 posters |
|
Author | Message |
---|
mc666 Master Sailboat
Number of posts : 9301 Age : 45
| Subject: Re: Bands that started off great BUT... Sun Aug 12, 2007 3:32 pm | |
| - krokus wrote:
- metalness wrote:
- mc666 wrote:
Death Bathory Megadeth
Waaaaa?!!! Totaly agree, all those 3 bands started increible good and little by little they started to release more shity albums. Krokus is a very astute metalhead _________________ | |
|
| |
krokus Metal is in my blood
Number of posts : 4238 Age : 48
| Subject: Re: Bands that started off great BUT... Sun Aug 12, 2007 3:33 pm | |
| | |
|
| |
mr.electric39 Heart of Metal
Number of posts : 1828 Age : 56
| Subject: Re: Bands that started off great BUT... Sun Aug 12, 2007 10:08 pm | |
| Quiet Riot...... ? Twisted Sister...... Under the Blade and You Can't Stop RNR were great...... Anthrax........ Megadeth..... I loved the first two, but when 'so far...' came out, it sounded a lot less heavier.... agree with early comment that it seems they got back to what they usta be. | |
|
| |
SAHB Healer Metal is in my blood
Number of posts : 2793 Age : 66
| Subject: Re: Bands that started off great BUT... Mon Aug 13, 2007 12:31 am | |
| I've felt this way personally about Amorphis and Stratovarious; but the sales figures disagree with me. Also from what some of you guys have said, both have come back strong recently. If I had any money I'd check out their new albums. | |
|
| |
mc666 Master Sailboat
Number of posts : 9301 Age : 45
| Subject: Re: Bands that started off great BUT... Mon Aug 13, 2007 11:31 am | |
| - SAHB Healer wrote:
- I've felt this way personally about Amorphis
me too, same with Anathema _________________ | |
|
| |
candlemass Heart of Metal
Number of posts : 2096 Age : 61
| |
| |
T-Roy Metal is in my blood
Number of posts : 4077 Age : 51
| Subject: Re: Bands that started off great BUT... Tue Aug 14, 2007 10:54 am | |
| Here's another, I noticed someone else put in but I was just thinking about way back when i bought it how disapointed I was!!
Bride
They started out awesome, hardcore!
Then Knetic Faith came out, and I was like WTH!?!?!?! AWEFUL. never the same again. Tried some more after that, and still, terrible. | |
|
| |
Thrasher73 Much Cooler than the other 72
Number of posts : 8918 Age : 51
| Subject: Re: Bands that started off great BUT... Tue Aug 14, 2007 11:08 am | |
| Actually I think Bride stayed decent until Drop came out.After that they seemed to follow every trend to come along.And Skin for Skin is a good return to form. | |
|
| |
candlemass Heart of Metal
Number of posts : 2096 Age : 61
| Subject: Re: Bands that started off great BUT... Tue Aug 14, 2007 7:12 pm | |
| - thrasher73 wrote:
- Actually I think Bride stayed decent until Drop came out.After that they seemed to follow every trend to come along.And Skin for Skin is a good return to form.
Yea that was good, I thought "This is It" was the return to form though. | |
|
| |
scottmitchell74 Jada Pinkett Smith's Cabana Boy
Number of posts : 9052 Age : 50
| Subject: Re: Bands that started off great BUT... Tue Aug 14, 2007 7:56 pm | |
| - Quote :
- Amorphis
Agree also.... - Quote :
- Actually I think Bride stayed decent until Drop
Again...I agree. Silence Is Madness will always be WAY up on my favorites list but I really enjoyed the Kinetic Faith-Snakes...- Scarecrow Messiah trifecta of gritty, bluesy-ish metal. Drop even had a couple keepers....but then it was pretty bad for a while. I think This Is It is pretty good....although what I've heard of Skin To Skin hasn't thrilled me much.....maybe I'll get it and let it grow on me....(not something I normally do, but hey, it's Bride) | |
|
| |
Sponsored content
| Subject: Re: Bands that started off great BUT... | |
| |
|
| |
| Bands that started off great BUT... | |
|